Obama’s EPA Nominees Have No Knowledge Of How The Weather Works

cap-300x265

The Hoax Of Global Warming

 

It is amazing to listen to Obama’s nominees to the Environmental Protection Agency’s display their ignorance of how the environment works.  Their lack of science  knowledge regarding what is known as Global Warming, also known as Climate change, or the “weather”, and how it works is appalling .  Just watch this exchange between Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) and Janet McCabe, Obama’s nominee to head the EPA’s Air and Radiation office, at an Environment and Public Works Committee hearing earlier today.  It proves one thing: Obama’s nominees have no science knowledge of how the climate works, and they ignore the scientific community’s findings about global warming.  They make up their own facts.

 

How are these people even qualified for the job?

 

Now watch at the end of the video where Barbara Boxer (Communist – Kalifornia)  tries to sneak into the record an unscientific inference used by global warming activists to falsely claim man-made warming exists, and that a heated atmosphere causes increases in hurricanes.  Boxer uses a dishonest attempt to change the facts and use a false hypothesis.  There is no scientific evidence to support the theory that when the air warms it “can” create more hurricanes.  There’s no way to accurately measure that claim since the world temperatures are different at different levels in the atmosphere.  The evidence is right there in the IPCC report that there has not been any increase in either hurricanes, tornadoes, or any other weather anomalies because of warming in the last 100 years.  Yet, Boxer and McCabe are going to ignore the scientific evidence anyway.

These environmentalist kooks are so determined to create an atmosphere of fear in the public, they are willing to spread false information to create a public panic.  Why?  What For?  Money!  Follow the Money!  

It has always been about the money.  Rich liberal donator’s get kickbacks in the form of taxpayer’s monies for campaign donations.  Every single one of Obama’s donator’s were awarded with taxpayer’s monies to create “Green Energy Companies”.  Solyndra, Evergreen Solar, and Beacon Power, are just a few of almost 100 companies that received millions of taxpayer’s monies, only to go belly-up!  This is something the private sector would have never invested into because the business model would have nevered worked!  Because of government regulations, the high tax base, and foreign competition;  read more here and here!

Albert Gore claimed in his movie, The Inconvenient Truth, a fictional documentary claiming that global warming exists and is caused by mans activities.  Remember his claim that the Polar Ice Caps will be melted by 2014 if the government didn’t take control of industries, force people into government controlled cars and homes, and shut down all fossil fuel development.  A huge hoax!

None of those claims have proven to be correct, just the opposite has occurred.  If there is such a thing as man made global warming (and there isn’t), then the cause would be from bad government policies.  The waste of money the Obama regime has spent is a form of environmental pollution.  However, that hasn’t stopped environmental madness from destroying the environment.

The environmentalist don’t want to consider that the medieval Warming Period, which lasted from about AD 950 to 1250, was not man-made, there were no SUV’s running around back then.  The growing seasons were longer and people lived longer.  In contrast, a cooling earth makes for colder seasons, and more famine and death.  It seems the environmentalists prefer death over life!

 

friedBirds

 

The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System is the largest solar array in the world, and the largest migratory bird frier.  That’s correct!  Environmentalist plans for “clean energy” using solar energy is killing birds that fly over the array and burning them to a crisp.  Nearly 350,000 gigantic mirrors are generating 1000 degree Fahrenheit temperatures.  Isn’t that heating up the atmosphere also?  Isn’t this making the Earth’s temperature increase, exponentially?  Are environmentalist willing to slaughter animals to protect the planet?  Is this their barbaric sacrifice to their God Gaia? 

Worlds Largest Solar Plant

 

Of course, we’ve all seen the video’s of  birds being clobbered by the windmills that were suppose to be generating “clean energy!”

 

 

I live on a volcano that emits tonnes of sulfur dioxide everyday!  More than all the U.S. coal fired power plants emit in a year.  When mixed with the atmosphere, it returns back to Earth as acid rain.  That’s my drinking water when properly filtered, and my water I use to irrigate my farm.  Our primary source of power is fossil fuels, and  that power is supplemented with wind, solar and geothermal.  We have the resources in this country to produce our own power cheaply, but environmentalists are against using cheap forms of energy production.  They prefer to use expensive unreliable sources of power.  Energy sources that have detrimental consequences to the environment.  It doesn’t make any sense!  Environmentalists are killing animals and destroying the land to install unreliable energy sources.

 

eyesore

Does This Look Environmentally Friendly?

 

In Kalifornia, Barbara Boxer’s home state of insanity, the government has cut off the supply of water to the central valley.  What was once the most productive growing region in the world lays waste  to man-made drought, all because of a fish, a common smelt.  The environmentalists would rather starve people of jobs, homes and the environment, all because of a minnow!  That’s dangerous thinking, that’s foolish thinking, that’s pure idiocy!  This is the way democrats think!  They ignore science and facts, and promote fairy tale utopian societies; they put people’s lives and our way of life in danger to the cruelty of the world’s realities.

 

easter_egg_line

 

What’s For Dinner?

 

Salad

 

The Earth’s Bounty Of Fresh Vegetables

 

 

 

Uninstall FireFox!

gayHate

 

I cannot believe Mozilla’s decision to fire Brendan Eich, the chief executive of Mozilla and the maker of Firefox.  My once favorite browser is now dead to me.  Uninstalled and Gone!  I’m using a different browser now.  I will not tolerate facist hate groups, nor will I tolerate any company the caves to totalitarian demands by these hate groups.

Because Brendan Eich was forced to resigned after coming under fire for his 2008 support of Proposition 8, the Kalifornia constitutional amendment that disallowed the marriage of same-sex couples in the state.  Which, at the time, both Obama and Hillary Clinton supported traditional marriage also.  Now out of convenience, Obama decides to evolve for votes.  Rubbish!

Under pressure by liberal hate groups, like OkCupid, which I will refer to from now on as OkStupid, that ran a smear campaign against Firefox.  By the way, OkStupid’s co-founder and CEO Sam Yagan once donated to an anti-gay candidate Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Utah) in 2004.  Read about that here!  Hypocrites!
ffSupport

I’ve taken the time to let Mozilla know my feelings about this, on social media: Facebook and Twitter.  I also let them know my feelings at their support website.  This kind of intolerance cannot stand.  Hate groups that can force a person to lose their employment because of expressing their personal views is simply wrong; this is is nothing more than nasty intolerance by bigots.

What was so wrong that Eich had to be made an example of?  He donated $1,000 to Kalifornia’s Prop 8, which was overwhelmingly voted in, and then overturned by an activist gay judge.  He didn’t besmirch gay people.  He didn’t insult gay people.  He didn’t express hatred towards gay people.  He just expressed his support for traditional marriage.  So his voice is to be silenced by intolerance hate groups, a small minority of loud mouth bullies, that practice the new age of McCarthyism?!?!

 

BYE BYE FIREFOX

 

ffUninstall

I live and work with people that are gay, and they are as outraged by this as I am.  I support traditional marriage, marriage between one man and one woman.  If two men, or two women, want to pretend to be in a traditional marriage; fine, knock yourselves out.  Don’t expect me to recognize it as such.  No one is preventing you from doing so.

On Fox News over the weekend, a Gay rights activist and blogger John Aravosis defended the activism that ultimately led to Eich’s resignation, and raised the hypothetical scenario of a major CEO who happened to be a Holocaust-denier.  WTF???  That’s completely ridiculous and stupid, and to make that comparison shows the extreme ignorance of the intolerant left.  These are the same people that routinely accuse conservatives of being intolerant.  Rubbish!

This cannot be allowed to stand.  If we allow hate groups like this to continue to decide who can be employed, then we will all lose our freedoms.  Mozilla needs to be hurt by their decision to support hate groups demands.  These extremists need to be shamed for their intolerance and bigotry.

UNINSTALL FIREFOX! NOW!

 

This is not the first instance where the intolerant grievance industry has pushed innocent people around for expressing their views.  People that had nothing wrong, people who did not discriminate, people that had not done anything more than express their opinion, their beliefs.  Nothing that Eich either said, or did, was wrong, but because he exercised his right to free speech, free expression, he was attacked viciously by these intolerant hate groups.  If they can destroy a person’s career just for exercising their right to free speech, then they can do this to anyone and get away with it.  That is wrong on all levels.  That is Un-American!

 

easter_egg_line

 

What’s For Dinner?

 

lambSweetBean

 

Roast Lamb with Candied Yams and Green Beans

 

 

 

Sustainable Lies

SustainLie

 

A disturbing trend by celeb scientists, entrepreneurs, and corrupt politicians to silence any discussion behind the hoax of global warming, by publicly admonishing so called “deniers”.  It seems Al Gore has managed to resurrect his efforts to force the American people and reputable scientists to accept as “fact” that the world is in danger of burning up.  Enlisting the help of questionable celebrity loudmouths like Bill Nye, the fake science guy, as some kind of “subject matter expert” to frighten people into believing in an unproven science theory.

cap-300x265

Richard Branson, CEO of Virgin Airlines and Space entrepreneur, has told global warming deniers to “get out of the way!”  In other words, don’t dare question man-made global warming, or else!  Following after Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook’s crazed outburst to investors get out of Apple stock if you don’t agree with his “green investment strategy.”  Branson has become the next voice in a chain of non-scientific CEO’s to publicly admonish investors that question the validity of the man-made global warming claim.  Yet, Branson’s airline is a huge polluter!

hotncold

It’s my way, or the highway!  In the minds of the intolerant left over the green energy agenda.  It’s not clear what the end goal of what a “sustainable” green environment will deliver since countries like China and India are not participants in the environmentalism movement.  What is certain is that green energy initiatives are costly and currently ineffective.  That doesn’t mean you don’t try to make the technology cost effective.  Likewise, you don’t want the government to use taxpayers’ monies to develop the technology, the government is a lousy investor of other people’s money.

BlackHole_Lensing

Equally disappointing is Astrophysics Neil deGrasse Tyson’s call to the media to stop giving equal time to global warming deniers.  I wonder about Tyson’s credibility as a scientist.  Has he fallen into the science consensus where the claim of science being settled is never to be questioned, ever?  Tyson’s television show debut, “Cosmos”, the remake of the late great Carl Sagan’s popular show on the science of the universe, was disappointing. Especially after the “Liar-in-Chief” Obama made the opening statement to the program.  In the show’s first episode, Tyson spent too much time on the life and persecution of Giordano Bruno, and almost nothing about other astronomers in history.  If this is what we can expect from Tyson’s remake of this classic show on science, then I predict it won’t get the ratings Tyson is hoping for.  Despite the great visual graphics, if the Cosmos presentation waivers off scientific principle and into political morality, then the show will quickly turn off people’s interest.


smJuliaGold

Why would a scientist like Tyson voice an opinion of intolerance against other climate scientists that disagree with the premise that global warming is man-made?  The science is not settled because there are no facts to connect a changing climate to man’s activities.  Climatologist like Dr. Roy Spencer and meteorologist Joe Bastardi, have empirical evidence to back up their claims that man-made climate change doesn’t exist, and that there are other factors that drives changes in the weather.

st019

NASA scientists James Hansen and Michael Mann used computer models as their evidence of global warming.  Both Mann and Hanson have a motivation to create a manufactured climate crisis in order to continue receiving government funding for their research.  There is evidence that both Hanson and Mann have falsified data about their claim of man-made climate change. Celebrity elites have romanticized global warming as their cause du jour.  If the climate is really changing because of man’s activities, then why haven’t supporters of that theory presented any evidence, other than computer models, to support their hypothesis?  Why are climate change supporters trying to shut off any debate by deniers?  Is their data so flimsy and questionable that they must prevent any debate?  Isn’t what Tyson is saying about the religious intolerance and persecution of Giordano Bruno, the same thing as denying deniers media access?  Science is not a consensus, and you don’t vote for science.

fractal

Enter the corrupt politicians.  Socialist democrats have used the environment to get funding and legislation passed to benefit themselves and their families.  They are robbing the American taxpayers’.  Obama spent over a trillion dollars to develop green energy initiatives and all of Obama’s policies have failed.  Thousands of people have lost their jobs.  Now, members of Congress want to waste more taxpayer monies to push another green energy program.

snotzs

Hawai’i’s unelected slip-and-fall lawyer, Brian Schatz, who was appointed by Hawai’i’s governor Neil “Crusty the Clown” Abercrombie after the death of Senator Daniel Inouye, is organizing a “talkathon” to try and convince the public that climate change is real.  After one of the coldest winters on record, these politicians still want to convince the public that the world is warming because of man’s activities.  After the EPA shutoff the water to California’s central valley and destroyed thousands of acres of crops, the government is claiming global warming is causing the drought.  If global warming is man-made, then YES!  Our government’s own stupidity has caused an environmental disaster.

nuke-tree

Clearly the environmentalist movement has been replaced by the communists party USA.  The movement is now an extremist organization whose goal is to hurt the United States economy.  They are emboldened by their leader, the liar in chief Obama, to over-regulate and over tax American’s, and American industries.  This is economic terrorism on a national scale.

Gaia

Why do they, the democrats, want to do this?  Answer: To deflect away from Obama’s disastrous socialist policies.  Especially, Obamacare. Several socialist democrats are up for reelection, and by creating a strawman environment argument over the false narrative of global warming, it draws attention away from Obama’s policies that are hurting the American economy.  It is a classic bait-and-switch deflection just like Obama’s claim; “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor!  If you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance!”  If you like your environment, the government will come in and take your environment.  Either way, America loses.

 

rwbline

 

 What’s For Dinner?

 

ScShSpDia

 

Shrimp and Scallops Fra Diavolo

 

 

 

The Flowers Are Poisoned and the Cake Has Gone Rancid.

godless intolerance

 

The Arizona law designed to protect religious freedoms, is under attack by leftist extremists that hate freedoms.  Leftist only believe in equality, not liberty, there is a huge difference. By taking away religious freedoms, the leftist extremists thinks that will make us more equal. We are all equal, but the leftist activist’s does not allow liberty to thrive with equality. People of conscience are denied liberty on how they to decide to run their businesses. The Government will now decide how you will run your business, under penalty of Intolerance.

No One Is Dictating Who You Can Love!  

Only The Intolerant Leftists Are Saying That!

The NFL?   Really?  The NFL???  How far has leftism encroached onto society?

The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion and freedom of expression, no matter if you don’t like it. Suppose the government forces you to listen to Islamic hatred about gays, Jews and Christians?  Suppose the government forces you to participate in gay marriages, and watch them engage in sexual acts?  Suppose the government forces your children to be taught about the joys of anal and oral sex?  Without learning the consequences of Sexually Transmitted Diseases.  Is that what you want?  You won’t have a choice!  The government will mandate these laws as “Social Justice” and a reconciliation to the past perceived injustices.  Injustices that have been long ago been exposed and reconciled.  However, that’s not enough for the liberal extremists.  They want more of your freedoms.  So much so, they will take your existing freedoms away.  They call it, Progressiveness’!

If someone comes into my business and wants to buy my cakes and flowers, there is no problem!  If someone wants me to participate in baking a cake to Satan, the government will now force me to comply. If I don’t, the government will jail me and put me out of business. So I have to expose my family and my children to immorality, to comply with the law of immoral politicians.  I am not equating homosexuality with either atheism or satanism.  I am just using this as an example of the extremist position being foisted upon the people.  The point is; no one is as intolerant as the leftist extremist that uses absurdity to create laws in an atmosphere of fear.  The Arizona law is trying to protect people from this absurdity.

That’s not what the First Amendment is about. Freedom of conscience, and freedom of speech, is not just a one way street. Freedom of expression is not limited to a select few. Freedom of choice is not to be regulated by the government. COMMON SENSE, used  to be a reasonable way and to make good decisions that benefited everyone. The Constitution is the LAW of the LAND. The Constitution is the Supreme Law. It is fundamentally based on the laws of freedom: The Magna Carta. The Freedom of Natural Law. The Rights of Human Liberty. From liberty and freedom, comes equality. It is the end result we all desire!

If the bakery, and the florist, don’t want to participate in your gay wedding: CHOOSE ANOTHER! MOVE ON!

Taking people to court and suing them only demonstrates your intolerance for others. Enjoy your cake and flowers. When the real forces of intolerance comes for you, you’d better hope we, the ‘tolerant one’s’, still have the faith in God to help you.

Niemöller, said it best: When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.

The Intolerant Godless Leftist are setting the stage, and you are all being played upon it.  Wake up!  Before it’s too late.

 

blue_line

 

What’s for Dinner?

 

2014-02-23 17.40.37

 

 

Pan Seared Ahi Tuna with Wok Charred Vegetables

 

 

Hawaii Beer Blast #52: Your Weekly Craft Beer Update

Pono or Porno : Hawai’i Sex Ed Choices

porn

 

What the heck are the Hawai’i Public [or rather Pubic] Teachers thinking?  A new sex education program being introduced called “Pono Choices” gets into explicit sexual activity.  To the point of actually describing certain sexual acts in graphic detail.  The program is targeted at middle school children ages 11 through 13.  This 10 hour program has been taught to about 1,700 middle school students at a cost of $800,000 as a pilot program.  One state legislator has concerns about the programs content.

mcdermott1

 

“Pono”, in the Hawaiian language means: goodness, uprightness, morality, of moral being. Of course, we all know the definition of porno, but is this curriculum’s content seems inappropriate for middle school children of 11 to 13 years of age?

State Rep. Bob McDermott, whose eight children are enrolled in Hawai’i’s public schools, doesn’t want his children exposed to a controversial taxpayer-funded sex education program.  He believes parents should have the say in a subject matter that goes outside the normal education curriculum of reading, writing and math.

From Hawai’i Reporter:

McDermott said the program is “medically inaccurate” and not biology based, and that it teaches children about topics such as anal sex, sex with multiple partners and how to put on a condom — using a cucumber or wooden replica of a penis.

“The program normalizes a homosexual lifestyle and anal sex, while failing to warn students of the extreme dangers of anal sex; it references multiple sex partners, while failing to inform students about the health benefits of monogamy; it fails to warn students about the ineffectiveness of condoms against HPV, herpes, and anal sex; and fails to educate students on the stages of human reproduction,” McDermott said, providing Hawaii Reporter with an early copy of his report.

 “Any talk of anal sex — which the curriculum does frequently — is instinctively repulsive for pre-pubescent children. Additionally, calling the anus a genital — as Pono Choices does — is just plain medically wrong,” McDermott said.

I wrote to the Hawai’i State legislature asking what are they doing about this, I got a two replies from some lawmakers:

Senator Mike Gabbard replied saying he’s concerned and will look into it. Yawn!

Senator Russell Ruderman’s reply to me was less than enthusiastic, saying that he didn’t believe the program was that extreme as worded, and that he will be watchful of what’s presented to kids in school.  He doesn’t believe, which means he doesn’t know.

I got the impression from Mr. Ruderman’s reply to me was to go pound sand.  Then again, Ruderman is an extremist liberal who would probably welcome child sexual tourism in Hawai’i.

Hawai’i Reporter Malia Zimmerman, the article’s author, whom I copied on my initial message to the legislators, also replied back to me:

Being in the media, I am writing about the program and talking about it on my radio show, but believe it or not, most lawmakers are ignoring the issue, and the DOE continues to push the agenda.

 Last night there was a parent meeting at the capitol and there were several hundred people in attendance, so we will see what comes out of it.

 But the board of education is appointed by the governor and the governor, as far as i know, is in support.

We will continue to shine the light on what is happening and hope the parents will take it from here.

mcdermott5

Tolerance vs. intolerance – pedophile tourism – sexual tourism – its common place in countries like Thailand and in some Islamic countries where sexual predators can marry children as young as 9 years old.  Is this the future of Hawai’i tourism?  Educating children to be tolerant and accepting of dangerous sexual activity, is that the new norm for sexual education?

I don’t know if Mr. Ruderman has any children in middle school being taught this curriculum, but Mr. McDermott may and I’m sure he’s familiar with some of the material being taught.

This story has gotten the attention of other media outlets in Hawai’i.  Civil Beat is an online news media outlet that has also followed the story.  Civil beat reporter Alia Wong reports that both Rep. McDermott and Senator Sam Slom have accused the Department of Education of stonewalling them from getting any information about the controversial program.

The DOE states that anyone wanting to learn about the material, which was also developed jointly by the University of Hawai’i at Manoa and the DOE, said they would be willing to have a professional discuss the curriculum material.

The course material includes a teacher’s handbook, a student workbook and a digital presentation; however, the DOE has refused to hand over the information.  Both Sen. Slom and Rep. McDermott refused the DOE and University’s offer.

But why wouldn’t the UH and DOE allow the lawmakers the opportunity to review the materials for themselves?  That doesn’t make sense to me unless the material did include some material that would be objectionable to some parents.  It’s the job of the legislature to provide oversight for such things, especially since the DOE is now appointed by the governor.

As the DOE describes Pono Choices; it is described as a medically accurate teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention program for kids in grades six through eight. It was developed specifically for children in Hawaii by UH Manoa’s Center on Disability Studies through funding from the federal Office of Adolescent Health. The two-week review, according to the DOE, concluded that Pono Choices is indeed appropriate for schools.

Controversy surrounding Pono Choices — which is already being used at 12 public schools and could soon be adopted by another eight — emerged when opponents of same-sex marriage claimed its legalization would force schools to teach about the “homosexual lifestyle.” Slom, during a special session floor speech, brandished a Pono Choices workbook to argue that the DOE is already teaching kids that gay relationships and sex are appropriate.

There has been a push by liberal extremists to take parental control away from the family.  Educators and liberals have maintained that they should assume the parental role because they believe they know what’s best for the child.  Never mind that the parents’ values and religious objections to such material may be offensive to them.  However, liberals don’t believe in individual rights, parental rights, or any rights.  They believe that all rights come from the government and will be allowed by their approval.

In addressing criticism of the Common Core national education standards, a panelist at the Center for American Progress (CAP), a liberal think tank, said critics were a “tiny minority” who opposed standards altogether, which was unfair because “the children belong to all of us.” 

Get that parents?  You are a “tiny minority” to these big government people, and your children are not really yours.  They belong to the state.

However, the larger picture may be missing here.  Whenever the state claim ownership of your children, it should ring the alarms to any parent.  History has shown abusive governments have been using children to do the states bidding.  Hitler did that with his youth corps and so did Stalin, they encouraged children to turn in their parents if they disagreed with the states policies.  Today in some Islamic countries they are using their children as human shields and even strapping bombs on them as future martyrs for jihad.  We know they have used the mentally disabled as human bombs.  Breeding the next generations of terrorism.

Gateway pundit asks, is progressive a synonym for communist?  MSNBC is a pretend to be cable news channel, socialist leaning as at best, and racist at worse.  Here’s MSNBC’s tampon girl, [remember she wore tampon earrings], Melissa Harris-Perry explaining that, although your children are yours, they don’t really belong to you.  It takes a village to raise an idiot.

Conclusion:  There has been a long pattern emerging, now with greater veracity by liberals to push an agenda of anti-American traditional values. Progressive liberals have been chipping away at American values of morality and goodness for years.  Groups that used to provided moral guidance for boys and girls, are now given the seal of progressive liberal approval of immoral tolerance.  Teachers should be educating children on how to balance a checkbook and not how to place condoms on a bananas.  That should be left to the parents to decide what sexual education meets their religious and moral values, not the state.

Liberals will argue that promiscuity will be rampant among children without their guidance.  However, unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases will spread without liberal guidance anyway.  Nothing will stop neither natures desires nor the raging hormones of some pimply teenager.  Having some central planing educator introducing a melange of sexual choices at middle school ages is like grabbing a handful of prescription jellybeans drugs, and saying try these, and ignore your  parents.  Then they can eventually go to college and become a professor of leisure studies.  Some future prospects to consider.

The Boy Scouts now allow gay members and leaders.  The Girl Scouts now sell abortions along with cookies.  Grassroots groups like the Tea Party have been trying to take back the letter of the United States Constitution: Individualism, liberty and freedoms. But the progressives liberals are taking your rights away for government dependencies, selfishness and entitlements.  It’s an government proscription for addiction that once hooked, it cannot be changed.  We’ve seen this before in history, and it has never turned out well.

mcdermott3

 

What’s For Dinner?

 

2014-01-04 18.38.24

 

Alaskan Cod En Papillote with Steamed Jasmine Rice

 

 

So God Made A Farmer and A Liberal Destroyed God

farmer

It has been very troubling lately reading the commentary on the internet news websites like Civil Beat.  Whenever there is a post, and a [less than civil] discussion about farming and ranching, there is an immediate hostility towards those that are farmers.

It is almost rabid, with the environmentalist, and anti-corporate liberal activists haters, leading the charge with hateful misinformation.  They have found an easy target to attack; the very people that supply us with our food source.  The people that work the land and grow crops for sale in the markets, they are now accused of poisoning our food supply.   Deliberately!

In reality, the liberals hate agriculture corporations like Monsanto.  Obama placed Monsanto executives in the Food and Drug Agency (FDA).  So the liberal activists take out their anger on the farmer.  They lobby politicians to pass laws preventing farmers from using the tools farmers need to provide the grocery stores with the food safety we all take for granite.   They point their finger at farmers and accuse them of poisoning people.  It is simply not true!  Just like one of Obama’s many lies, the liberal activist’s, use fear and intimidation to attack generations of Hawaiian farmers that have been genuine stewards of the ‘Aina! (land)

bodySnachers

Haole Liberal Activist Pointing Finger

It is absurd and beyond belief, but liberals are campaigning on a narrative of hate and fear to demonize Hawaiian farmers.  Accusing them of deliberately poisoning people.  They have no proof of any Hawaiian farmer poisoning the food supply, so the liberal activists make up false stories to scare people into believing this hoax!

Politicians and environmentalist have found a boogy-strawman argument regarding the techniques to modern day farming.

These ignorant people are going to destroy an industry because of  their hatred of corporations.  We will see the price of food increase, all because of fear mongering and ignorance.  Thank a liberal for your higher food prices.

 

So Be It Then

Get back To Me

Challenged by modern society about exactly what his role is in the world, a lone farmer mounts a defence based on one phrase: “Get back to me.”

makemine16-farmer

Once those chains are shackled upon us, there is no turning back

 

The late Paul Harvey had the insight to see many things into the future.  The use of drugs in America, the moral decline in America, and the attacks on farmers in America.  We are destroying our future by listening to people that think they know better than the rest of us.  They are called progressives.  Democrats and Socialists.  They are the Nanny State America.

 

And on the 8th day, God looked down on his planned paradise and said, “I need a caretaker.” So God made a farmer.

God said, “I need somebody willing to get up before dawn, milk cows, work all day in the fields, milk cows again, eat supper and then go to town and stay past midnight at a meeting of the school board.” So God made a farmer.

“I need somebody with arms strong enough to rustle a calf and yet gentle enough to deliver his own grandchild. Somebody to call hogs, tame cantankerous machinery, come home hungry, have to wait lunch until his wife’s done feeding visiting ladies and tell the ladies to be sure and come back real soon — and mean it.” So God made a farmer.

God said, “I need somebody willing to sit up all night with a newborn colt. And watch it die. Then dry his eyes and say, ‘Maybe next year.’ I need somebody who can shape an ax handle from a persimmon sprout, shoe a horse with a hunk of car tire, who can make harness out of haywire, feed sacks and shoe scraps. And who, planting time and harvest season, will finish his forty-hour week by Tuesday noon, then, pain’n from ‘tractor back,’ put in another seventy-two hours.” So God made a farmer.

God had to have somebody willing to ride the ruts at double speed to get the hay in ahead of the rain clouds and yet stop in mid-field and race to help when he sees the first smoke from a neighbor’s place. So God made a farmer.

God said, “I need somebody strong enough to clear trees and heave bails, yet gentle enough to tame lambs and wean pigs and tend the pink-combed pullets, who will stop his mower for an hour to splint the broken leg of a meadow lark. It had to be somebody who’d plow deep and straight and not cut corners. Somebody to seed, weed, feed, breed and rake and disc and plow and plant and tie the fleece and strain the milk and replenish the self-feeder and finish a hard week’s work with a five-mile drive to church.

“Somebody who’d bale a family together with the soft strong bonds of sharing, who would laugh and then sigh, and then reply, with smiling eyes, when his son says he wants to spend his life ‘doing what dad does.’” So God made a farmer.

isms

Politicians selling “ism’s”

Organics sell a utopia of healthy living, but they never tell you that they use more pesticides and poisons on their products.

Organic Poisoning Is Real

bardolph

 

What’s For Dinner?

DSCN1216

 

The Fruits Of Our Labor

 

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 788 other followers

%d bloggers like this: