Liberals intensely fear Sarah Palin. But why is that? Never have I’ve seen a person attacked so vehemently by liberals, and by the so-called liberal RINO conservatives, against Sarah Palin. Even her family has been viciously attacked by members of the media, elitists Republicans, and late night pervert comedians[note the videos have been removed by the source, hmmm]. Could it be liberals sense something intensely fearful about Sarah Palin? There is something about Sarah Palin that liberals despise more than anything else, and it sends them reeling in fear. But what is it about Sarah Palin that liberals and RINO’s fear?
A TRUE AMERICAN HERO
Yet, demonized by the liberals
This former [and Successful] Governor of Alaska that was John McCain’s Vice President running mate strikes fear, real FEAR, in the heartless, godless liberal, and RINO. The liberal that is a soulless selfish individual that believes in killing the unborn, yet coddles the terrorist that kills millions indiscriminately. It’s because they’re victims. The liberal that believes Down’s Syndrome children must be aborted, along with normal children. It’s population control, and all that you know. All those collectivizes that would deny the liberal thinking mindset of their fair share of everyone else’s wealth. What real greed is all about.
The liberal that believes in regulating people’s lives. Taking other people’s money and spending it on projects that are not very well thought out. Yes, the liberal media is fueling the fire of conservative prejudice by commenting on a book that Sarah Palin wrote, and that book hasn’t even been released yet. Until now.
Here’s David Brooks, a liberal [wannabe conservative] idiot, that considers Sarah Palin a joke.
I have read David Brooks articles and listened to his ramblings with great amusement and I have to laugh. Out Loud!
David Brooks is a lapdog that is only begging for attention from the Liberal Left.
Here’s a panel of liberals, with one conservative bashing liberal, commenting on their greatest fear. You see, if Sarah Palin were to ever to run for President Of The United States, I firmly believe she would WIN. That’s their fear. If Sarah Palin would win, they would loose credibility. We would WIN. BIG TIME. David Brooks would be the JOKE. Along with his buddy Obama, the both of them are jokers.
You see, these people like David Brooks, they need to keep a persona, a connection of acceptance with the liberal media. They need to be relevant and on television with the Sunday afternoon circuit talking heads. They need to be considered above the fray of the unwashed masses of conservative lifestyles. David Brooks, and others are a beacon of elitist conservative hoi polloi.
I do not have any time for these idiots anymore. Seriously. These would be OP-ED writers like Brooks, Frum, Parker and Noonan, these giants of intellectual elitist obtuseness, that hold the pulse of the liberal left with bated breath for needy acceptance. These clowns want to be loved by the liberals. Don’t pretend to be conservatives. Just make like a tree and leave. I would have expected better from MKH, but NO.
BAD NEWS FOR THE GOP?
EVERYONE ELSE?
HOW SO?
THE SOLUTION IS CLEAR
VOTE FOR PALIN IN 2012
WHAT’S FOR DINNER?
Sauteed Shrimp and Scallops on a Bed of Asparagus Risotto
When you know you are losing the argument, the acceptable thing to do is either, accept that you are loosing and “agree to disagree” or accept the reason of the discussion, and then move on. That’s what rational people would do right?
Not if you are a Professor at Columbia University.
NO! You punch that person in the face.
If that person is a White Woman, then it’s a case of privileged.
Meet Professor Lionel McIntyre
He likes to Beat Women
A prominent Columbia architecture professor punched a female university employee in the face at a Harlem bar during a heated argument about race relations, cops said yesterday.
Police busted Lionel McIntyre, 59, for assault yesterday after his bruised victim, Camille Davis, filed charges.
McIntyre and Davis, who works as a production manager in the school’s theater department, are both regulars at Toast, a popular university bar on Broadway and 125th Street, sources said.
The professor, who is black, had been engaged in a fiery discussion about “white privilege” with Davis, who is white, and another male regular, who is also white, Friday night at 10:30 when fists started flying, patrons said.
Considering that the esteemed Professor punched out a White Woman, that wouldn’t be considered racist, yes? Maybe the good professor was just disturbed like that moslum terrorist at Fort Hood? Maybe the pressures of academia are just too much to bear for one lowly professor who’s jealous of white privilege? But what is White Privilege anyway? Just a way to blame your own problems on someone else. Hitler blamed the Jews for Germany’s problems. Blaming white people for your problems is deserving of a sucker punch to the face.
“The punch was so loud, the kitchen workers in the back heard it over all the noise,” bar back Richie Velez, 28, told The Post. “I was on my way over when he punched Camille and she fell on top of me.”
It is offensive that the prominent violent professor with obvious radical racial views towards white people make claims about White Privilege, as being exclusive to Black People. At least I have to assume that was the argument. Nether the less, assaulting a person, whatever the argument, especially against a woman, is a cowardly act indeed. In a bar no less. This guy is a total douche bag. He deserved to be removed from the University.
Apparently, no one is considering the radical racist views of Professor Lionel McIntyre. If you do not agree with the arguments, then you get a punch in the face. I don’t think he would have cared if his victim was a female of male, only that his argument was weak. The professors solution, assault the person.
Is this the kind of curriculum one can expect in a New York University, on or off campus? They could threaten to hurt others just like Black Panthers intimated voters during the 2008 election. Or Worse, they could imply racism.
As we move this country closer to a socialized government and our freedoms become a thing of the past, it’s time to make some comparisons to other evil empires that poke fun at the sheer stupidity of a nightmare gone horribly wrong.
The government is gonna drive me to drinking if they don’t stop passing that evil legislation.
How bad is that Health Care bill Nancy Pelosi is trying to ram down your throat?
Real Bad
Purchase a $15,000 health insurance plan or GO TO JAIL. This is unbelievable.
Today, Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail. The JCT letter makes clear that Americans who do not maintain “acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years.
In response to the JCT letter, Camp said: “This is the ultimate example of the Democrats’ command-and-control style of governing – buy what we tell you or go to jail. It is outrageous and it should be stopped immediately.”
Key excerpts from the JCT letter appear below:
“H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.” [page 1]
- – - – - – - – - –
“If the government determines that the taxpayer’s unpaid tax liability results from willful behavior, the following penalties could apply…” [page 2]
- – - – - – - – - -
“Criminal penalties
Prosecution is authorized under the Code for a variety of offenses. Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:
• Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.
• Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” [page 3]
When confronted with this same issue during its consideration of a similar individual mandate tax, the Senate Finance Committee worked on a bipartisan basis to include language in its bill that shielded Americans from civil and criminal penalties. The Pelosi bill, however, contains no similar language protecting American citizens from civil and criminal tax penalties that could include a $250,000 fine and five years in jail.
“The Senate Finance Committee had the good sense to eliminate the extreme penalty of incarceration. Speaker Pelosi’s decision to leave in the jail time provision is a threat to every family who cannot afford the $15,000 premium her plan creates. Fortunately, Republicans have an alternative that will lower health insurance costs without raising taxes or cutting Medicare,” said Camp.
According to the Congressional Budget Office the lowest cost family non-group plan under the Speaker’s bill would cost $15,000 in 2016.
This is all about control over your lives. How can the government force you to purchase a health care plan? Is this even Constitutional? Under this monstrosity of a health care plan, you either purchase a plan force on you by the government, or you go to jail and pay a $250,000 fine. Having no health care insurance is now a crime, a felony?
Certifiably Insane
This monster has been taking too many botox shots to the head. Hey you folks living on the streets in San Francisco, Nutty Nancy the Nanny is gonna put you in Jail unless you come up with some cash to pay for her retirement fund.
How does this effect Hawai’i. Well, it doesn’t, kinda sorta. There is a provision in the house bill that allows Hawai’i to opt out of the plan:
A health care overhaul bill that the House could vote on as soon as tomorrow contains language to ensure that Hawaii’s expansive health coverage requirements wouldn’t be weakened.
Specifically, provisions inserted into the almost 2,000-page bill by Hawaii’s congressional delegation would protect the state’s Prepaid Health Care Act of 1974 from any changes imposed by the new federal legislation.
The health care act requires nearly all employers in Hawaii to provide health insurance to employees who work at least 20 hours a week for four consecutive weeks.
However, it still doesn’t exempt individuals from being forced to purchase government provided health care. Otherwise the individual could be charged with a crime of not having health insurance. What if I can pay outright, in cash, for any of my medical needs, doctor visits, prescription drugs or any other medical need? What if I rather pay for my health needs when I need it? There are people that can do that. They make enough money to pay for any medical services with out insurance.
Equally, what about those people who are really poor and cannot afford $15,000 to pay for health care? Hawai’i may have a progressive health care plan that forces employers to pay for their employees health care insurance, but not everyone in Hawai’i that works can afford such an expenditure. What about the independent self-employed person? What if the independent self-employed only makes $15,000 a year or less? What about the elderly on fixed incomes? At what age will forced health insurance be mandatory? What if you are working less than 20 hours a week and struggling to get through college?
Many Questions
No Answers
Say AH! And swallow the Bitter Pill
One thing is for sure.
This government take over will not stop at Heath Care.
The government will come after the Private sector, eventually.
Why becoming agnostic is more attractive day after day.
With incredible insensitivity to the military families, and indeed to all the nation,
TEH ONE, the Obama gives a shout out to his peeps.
Then pretends to be sympathetic to the horrors that took place at Fort Hood.
Insensitive In Chief
It is clear that Teh One, the Obama, hates the military. These people that swore an oath to protect this great nation are second class citizens to Teh One, the Obama. The Obama BOOB would rather give a Shout Out To His Peeps.
But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president making introductory remarks. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a “shout-out” to “Dr. Joe Medicine Crow — that Congressional Medal of Honor winner.” Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?
Yes, this is the same idiot that bows to the Saudi Prince. The same idiot that dithers making decisions to help the military in combat in Afghanistan and Iraq. The same idiot that refuses to go to Berlin to celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall. Apparently, anything that has to do with Freedom is not worth the effort.
US President Barack Obama has shelved his plans to attend festivities marking the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will reportedly take his place at the Nov. 9 celebrations.
MASTER
As the economy continues to suffer and unemployment tops 10%, the first time in over 26 years.
Spending Trillions of Dollars that soon will become hyper-inflation.
A couple of items caught my eye on this lovely Hawaiian Lāpule (Sunday) morning. From last weeks mornings headlines on the Tribune-Herald regarding developing a self-sustaining agriculture and energy self-reliance. It’s a good plan, if it’s carefully well thought out. Along with self-sustaining agriculture, there is the issue of bringing products to market. Which takes energy in the form of fuel. There have been several projects launched on the Big Island regarding energy, some are well thought out, others are not so well thought out.
Biomass fuels have become all the rage as an alternative to generating electricity rather than the petroleum-based products which generate much of our electricity here on the Big Island. The concept of burning trees for electricity has its merits, but also has a serious downside. What if you run out of trees?
HILO, Hawaii (AP) — A company seeking to fire up a wood-burning energy plant on the Big Island is facing community opposition as it works to address government requirements.
Hu Honua had hoped to begin selling power to Hawaii Electric Light Co. in late 2010.
But the company has added six months as it waits for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to approve modification of the old coal-burning plant’s existing air permit. Hawaii County and state requirements must also be met.
Some Pepeekeo residents have come out against the company’s plan to burn as much as 700 tons of wood and other biomass per day.
Opponents say the plant would create clouds of emissions and exhaust, noxious odors and a daily stream of trucks, leading to health problems and lower property values.
Indeed the clear cutting of trees would pose a serious problem to the ecosystem of Hawai’i. As demand for energy increases, more and more of Hawai’i’s natural resources will be used to generate electricity. The question has to be asked, “Is this a good use of the environment to produce energy?”; “Is this a sustainable use of our island resources?”. At 700 tons of wood per day, I would think you’d run out of trees very soon and trees don’t grow fast enough to be replenished as fuel for energy. Even if you were to burn garbage, the inherent consequences of burning garbage would be a solution to Hilo’s landfill problem, but what about the transportation of garbage to the site, the air quality from the burning of garbage and the quality of life for residents living near the biomass plant? Question: Is this a well thought out idea for energy self sustainability on the Big Island of Hawai’i? Alternative energies like wind and solar are good, but what do you do when the wind ceases and the sun sets? Like it or not, we will have to depend on petroleum base energies until either other alternative sources are found or a marriage between petroleum-based and alternative energies could be achieved . Until then, we should not exasperate our time, energy and resources on purchasing foreign oil when we have plenty here in this country to use. Drill Here, Drill NOW!
But what about that Global Warming Climate Change Thingy?
So burning Green is worse that burning Oil? Who would have thunk it?
Besides our energy needs, there is that nasty habit of being able to feed ourselves. All over the Big Island, there are pockets of entrepreneurship taking advantage of locally grown resources. Like the many Guava and Macadamia products produced by Mom and Pop stores on this island for example. Smoked meats and fish are very popular and are also home-grown enterprises.
Locally grown produce that is sold at the farmers markets and in chain grocery stores are generally more expensive in price than the same produce brought in from the mainland and sold at the larger grocery stores. Back in August, I asked a question to Hamakua Springs Country Farms about why the price of produce was more expensive than the locally grown produce. Hamakua Springs County Farms is a large supplier of produce on the Big Island of Hawai’i. I found the answer to my question intriguing:
1) One reason, not easily seen, is the over-enthusiastic State policy of facilitating commerce. The Department of Agriculture is required to help mainland and foreign retailers keep their imported produce moving.
2) Another problem is that most of our Hawai‘i farms are small – less than 25 acres. Smaller farms cannot make ends meet without charging higher prices. Also, they do not have the production capability to help their customers stay efficient and competitive. Higher land prices play into the above.
3) Hawai‘i depends on fossil fuel for 78 percent of the generation of its electricity, whereas the U.S. mainland uses oil for only three percent of its electricity generation. This is significant because produce is commonly refrigerated in order to maintain freshness and quality. Oil prices have been rising lately and so Hawai‘i farmers are spending more for refrigeration; or else they are gambling that the decline in quality that results from not cooling will be okay.
So, our state and federal government artificially raises the price of produce grown on this island, AND we have to follow California standards of inspection. Hello, California is going bankrupt and may not be able to feed itself due to its own environmental restrictions. Makes perfect sense, I suppose. I guess the food we import from China is subject to the same scrutiny as our food produced here in Hawai’i.
I suppose we’ll fix the problem once enough dogs, cats and people die. There has to be a better way to manage this other than the current method. Even so, there has to be a better way to manage locally grown produce, and lower the prices with greater profit. A good start is deregulation. The government artificially increases the price of food through over regulation. Another is the state taxes the sale of food:
So, how is it that the democratic majority is so successful in making the public believe that they are the party of the poor, when they tax the poor heavily? The food tax is the most regressive tax and, it disproportionally falls on the poor. Hawaii is one of only eight states that do not offer either a total exemption or decreased tax on food products in the United States. That’s right! The government even taxes you on food. And it isn’t at 4 %. It is more like 12-14% with the GET. We are the only state in America to tax you to death on food.
More to the point, is that Hawai’i’s liberal democrats are responsible for the high cost of living in Hawai’i. Hawai’i is also heavily unionized with liberal democrat leaders which have also compound the problem. Hawai’i’s budget shortfall has everyone across all sectors of the state’s economy cutting back to save money. The recent education union contract will cut 17 school days over a two year span. The decision to cut school days was the union’s decision and not the states. It unfairly hurts children and their parents by cutting valuable education time. The unions could have cut days that did not interfere with actual class time, but the unions put themselves ahead of Hawai’i’s children. Again, Hawai’i’s liberal democrats only think about themselves:
Gov. Linda Lingle told reporters she regrets signing off on the contract that requires teachers to take 17 furlough days this school year. Lingle said she assumed the Department of Education, state Board of Education and HSTA would draft a contract that had the best interest of students in mind.
But she says that did not happen.
So what do the unions suggest as an alternative to the state’s budget woes? RAISE TAXES! Yes, raise taxes, raid the hurricane fund, the rainy day fund. No solutions, just spend more taxpayer monies.
Some of Hawaii’s top Democratic political and union organizers attended, pressuring Republican Gov. Linda Lingle into releasing more funds to the state Department of Education. They want the governor to support the raiding of the state’s emergency Hurricane Fund, raiding of the Rainy Day Fund (again), and raising of state taxes again. Hawaii is already one of the overall highest taxed states in the nation.
Senator Sam Slom (R) 8th district has some thoughts on how to deal with Hawai’i budget crisis.
The Legislature should remove the cap on charter schools, since operating costs per pupil are half that of regular public schools.
The Board of Education must change the DOE budget so that 2/3 or all costs do not get spent on bureaucracy outside of the classroom.
The HSTA must release their stranglehold over the number of minutes of instruction time per week, now limited to approximately 4.5 hours per day.
These are Conservative ideas that liberal democrats do not want to consider. Why? It would hurt their chances getting reelected. The stranglehold unions have over state legislators is the root of the problem. Conservative Republicans for years have warned about Hawai’i’s budget projections only to be ignored by the majority liberal democrats. Since when were the unions running the government? The unions were not elected to run the government, but the unions are pulling the strings and making decision on how to spend our money.
People often wonder what is the difference between a Conservative and a liberal. The simple fact of the matter is that the major difference is that Conservatives wonder first what it is they are responsible for while liberals wonder first what everyone else should be doing for them.
Here are some brief rules of thumb:
If a conservative sees a U.S. flag, his heart swells with pride.
If a liberal sees a U.S. flag, he feels shame.
If a conservative doesn’t like guns, they don’t buy them.
If a liberal doesn’t like guns, then no one else should have one either.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he won’t eat meat.
If a liberal is, they want to ban all meat products for everyone.
If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat it.
If a liberal see an enemy he wonders what he can do to appease him.
If a conservative is homosexual, he’ll quietly enjoy his life.
If a liberal is homosexual, he’ll demand everyone get involved in his bedroom activities.
If a successful conservative is black or Hispanic, he’ll see himself as having succeeded on his own merits.
Successful liberal minorities still claim “racism” and want government to give them even more.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to work to better his situation.
A liberal wants someone else to take care of him.
If a conservative doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels.
If a liberal doesn’t like a radio show, he demands that the station be shut down or censored.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he just doesn’t go to church.
Non-believing liberals demand that everyone cease believing and demands churches be censored.
If a conservative needs health care, he shops for it, or chooses a job that provides it.
Liberals demand that everyone else provide him with healthcare for free.
If a conservative sees a law, he thinks long and hard before suggesting a change.
If a liberal sees a law he assumes it is just a suggestion and does what he wants anyway.
Conservatives feel there is a right and wrong.
Liberals feel that nothing is really wrong… unless it is believed by a conservative.
Conservatives believe in freedom, responsibility, tradition, and self-reliance.
Liberals believe in license, government restrictions, upending tradition, and collectives.
Just wanted to add my 2¢ to this list: Feel free to add to the list.
Conservatives believe in Individualism, Objectivism, Ethics, keeping what is earned and charity.
Liberals believe in Welfare, Handouts, High Taxes, Selfishness and taking other peoples money.
Conservatives believe in life, all life, especially the life of the Unborn and the elderly.
Liberals believe in death, abortion and assisted suicide.
Nancy (Bela Lugosi) Pelosi, the House or Representatives Speaker and blood sucking vampire, announced a sprawling labyrinth Health Care bill 1900 pages long with convoluted references to each section after section of… TAXES!
It includes a Government Run Public Option. It also probably includes Health Insurance for Illegal Immigrants, Abortion for Minors and most likely, your right to choose will be eliminated. Taxes on companies and individuals to pay for healthcare, a government plan that will not stop until you are fully under control by Doctor Obama’sIsm.
1900 Pagesof Socialism
That’s how many pages are in the Vampire’s Pelosi’s Health Care Bill. Put a dollar to every page and that’s your tax increase from year to year. Add for adjustment in actual cost and that will increase just like Medicare’s inception into law. Just like Social Security, it’s going bankrupt. Services will be limited to control costs. It is inevitable.
You can tell a Bill from the Congress is Bad when they will not allow the public to celebrate its announcement.
House Democrats blocked the public from attending the unveiling ceremony of their health care bill Thursday morning, allowing only pre-approved visitors whose names appeared on lists to enter the event at the West Front of the Capitol.
Apparently, if you are not on the list, then you don’t get to participate. Only hand picked persons were allowed to attend this cauldron of horror submitted by Nancy (Bela Lugosi) Pelosi and her band of Democratic Flying Monkeys Special Interest Groups.
With the fall of communism came a void that needed to be filled by those that want to impose their rules, impose their laws, and impose on our freedoms. The communist turned to environmentalism. Noted socialists like Al Gore, a democrat, has been manipulating environmental causes to line his pockets with money, and at your expense. The Al Gore film, An Inconvenient Truth, is being used to indoctrinate school children. When a Judge in Great Britain ruled that the film was exaggerated and alarmist, Al Gore never revised the film to correct his inaccuracies. Yet the film is still being shown in schools, although with a non-enforced disclaimer. Like those warnings that everyone fast-forwards through when watching a video or DVD.
.
What were those offensive items in Al Gore’s movie?
.
I would venture to say the movie was pure fiction and a political hack job. What the Obama would call a distraction. European leftist socialist have endorsed the film not for its environmental message, but for its message of government control over the lives of its citizens. Already some countries in Europe and many politicians here in this country are actively trying to impose laws on what you can eat, what you can drink, and what clothes you can wear. You have stories of the Miracle Tax Diet about obesity and how it effects the environment. That’s how it starts, by regulating activity, they start by making it expensive, then outlawing it.
But this isn’t just about Al Gore, no, it’s about spreading misinformation. Because Al Gore is well known and many people have caught on to his brand of propaganda. Now there’s a more insidious group spreading lies about the environment.
It’s all about CO2
Scaring young children into thinking adults are killing the planet
This Is Indoctrination
This is about control. Control of our lives. Controlling our habits. Controlling everything that we do. We will be controlled by the government. Academia has been indoctrinating students in higher education for years, so now they are starting at earlier ages. Ask any student about the subject matter they are suppose to be taught in school and they can’t answer correctly. But ask them about the polar bears and without flinching they’ll respond, “they’re all dieing“.
Intense Fear
Coward
Why becoming agnostic is more attractive day after day.
Constitution
A couple of items caught my eye on this lovely Hawaiian Lāpule (Sunday) morning. From last weeks mornings headlines on the 
And if you don’t like it, too bad
With the fall of communism came a void that needed to be filled by those that want to impose their rules, impose their laws, and impose on our freedoms. The communist turned to environmentalism. Noted socialists like Al Gore, a democrat, has been manipulating environmental causes to line his pockets with money, and at your expense. The Al Gore film, An Inconvenient Truth, is being used to indoctrinate school children. When a Judge in Great Britain ruled that the film was exaggerated and alarmist, Al Gore never revised the film to correct his inaccuracies. Yet the film is still being shown in schools, although with a non-enforced disclaimer. Like those warnings that everyone fast-forwards through when watching a video or DVD.
