Remember that report from the University of Maryland that concluded that Fox New viewers are the “Most Uninformed” about major stories, the election, and generally get the wrong idea and opinions.
Through a series of surveys and questions the report tried to say that people, regardless of their political affiliation, who watch Fox News, are severely misinformed.
A few Facebook friends brought up some great questions on who commissioned this study.
The study was sponsored by the group, World Public Opinion, which is funded by the Tides Foundation. A George Soro’s front organization dedicated to the destruction and overthrow of the United States economy and government. About.
Here’s how they came to that conclusion and what it all means:
I watch Fox News, and I watch the other cable news outlets, CNN, HLN and MSNBC.
There is only One Real News Channel, and that is Fox News
Gods may do, what cattle may not
The Obama regime has declared the American People as terrorists for opposing his socialist policies.
Foreign Ministry reports circulating in the Kremlin today are warning that an already explosive situation in the United States is about to get a whole lot worse as a new law put forth by President Obama is said capable of seeing up to 500,000 American citizens jailed for the crime of opposing their government.
In what is called the National Security Strategy document, that is required of US Presidents by their Congress, that embraces the dictatorial ideals of the “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act”, Obama has ordered his Federal police and intelligence forces to begin targeting Americans opposed to him and his radical socialist polices.
The EPA has declared a Terror War on power plants, refineries, and other industries it deems emitters of Carbon Dioxide, a necessary gas plants need to consume as food. The effort is to combat Global Warming. The continuing claim that the earth is warming and it is caused by human activities, the EPA will force states to cut their emissions. This will cripple the economy by making energy cost higher. The ripple effect will touch every industry and service in this country. The EPA wants to starve Plants.
What of the EPA and it’s ongoing Acts of Economic Terror against business and the American people?
Homeland Security thug, Janet Incompetano, has declared war on the traveling public with intrusive searches, and now is including malls and other public places. If you want to travel, you are forced to undergo an intrusive search by the TSA.
What of the terrorist acts against the American traveler by the TSA? If you complain and point out the laps in security, the TSA and Homeland Security will come after you. They did that to a pilot. They came to his house, harassed him, and threatened his job. All because he posted a video on YouTube on TSA security lapses.
Instead of looking for terrorists, Homeland Security is treating everyone as a Terrorist First, Travelers Last. Now, the Division of Homeland Security (DHS) wants to include what it calls Soft Targets. So why not profile?
A year after a foiled plot to bomb a US-bound passenger plane, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told CNN’s “State of the Union” program that other places and modes of transportation must now be scrutinized.
“We look at so-called soft targets — the hotels, shopping malls, for example — all of which we have reached out to in the past year and have done a fair amount of training for their own employees,” Napolitano said.
A foiled bomb plot? The same plot where Janet Incompetano claimed, “The System Worked“! The same plot where the Islamic Muslim Terrorist got on the plane and tried unsuccessfully to detonate his underwear bomb. This Islamic Muslim Terrorist was successful getting on the plane, so what part of the system worked?
So if we want to go shopping, stay in hotels, go to the malls, we will have to go through TSA screening first? Frisked before entering the Mall? Is this really necessary?
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
— Benjamin Franklin
Health and Human Services is mandating doctors to discuss end of life options. Paid for by taxpayer dollars. Also, the government is forming a Death Panel to decide what treatment you will get. They scoffed and laughed at Sarah Palin when she coined that phrase about Obamacare, and she was right. So they took the “End of Life” mandate out of the original bill, because the Democrats knew they wouldn’t be able to pass it. But that didn’t stop them from adding it after it was passed, and they did it in secret. They thought no one would find out. An email surfaced by the author of the original end of life mandate, Earl Blumenauer (D-OR).
After learning of the administration’s decision, Mr. Blumenauer’s office celebrated “a quiet victory,” but urged supporters not to crow about it.
“While we are very happy with the result, we won’t be shouting it from the rooftops because we aren’t out of the woods yet,” Mr. Blumenauer’s office said in an e-mail in early November to people working with him on the issue. “This regulation could be modified or reversed, especially if Republican leaders try to use this small provision to perpetuate the ‘death panel’ myth.”
Moreover, the e-mail said: “We would ask that you not broadcast this accomplishment out to any of your lists, even if they are ‘supporters’ — e-mails can too easily be forwarded.”
The e-mail continued: “Thus far, it seems that no press or blogs have discovered it, but we will be keeping a close watch and may be calling on you if we need a rapid, targeted response. The longer this goes unnoticed, the better our chances of keeping it.”
In the interview, Mr. Blumenauer said, “Lies can go viral if people use them for political purposes.”
Lies are lies, and Mr. Blumenauer is apart of those that favor death, over life. Why? Because when you’re too young, or too old, you’re not working to fund the death panel he wants. The government is not collecting taxes from you, because you are retired, or too young to work. You are not useful to the government and therefore, of no consequence.
Doctors currently do discuss with Patients end of life options. That should be between the doctor and the patient. The government shouldn’t be subsidizing doctors to discuss end of life options.
It ironic. You have Mrs. Obama claiming childhood obesity is an epidemic in this country, and Jeff Bridges is running around claiming children don’t get enough to eat. What’s troubling is Mrs. Obama’s statement that we cannot leave the decisions up to the Parents to do what’s right for the children.
“But when our kids spend so much of their time each day in school, and when many children get up to half their daily calories from school meals, it’s clear that we as a nation have a responsibility to meet as well,” Mrs. Obama said. “We can’t just leave it up to the parents.”
Can’t leave this up to the parents? Who deemed that Parents are incapable and incompetent to raise their children? Isn’t that a local issue? A PTA issue? Who determines, from Washington, what is proper nutrition for Children? This is Nanny State Terrorism.
The Internal Revenue Service is going to force citizens to file a form 1099 for every $600.00 transaction. Regulation, regulation, regulation. The Obama Regime is anti-business and over regulating.
The problem is, every question could be considered a Vexatious Requester. This would give a government entity to refuse to release information. Like how much does a bill cost? How will the cost of the bill be over time. Questions like these could be considered a nuisance and therefore ignored by the Government. In the case of Obama’s birth certificate, the State of Hawai’i passed a law making such requests annoying, and therefore ignoring.
When I saw this video, and accompanying text, I wondered what it meant. Other than the obvious.
美國民主黨眾院議員不滿總統歐巴馬（Barack Obama）屈服共和黨壓力，打算拖延表決他提出的展延減稅法案。期中選後「跛鴨」的歐巴馬，幾天前請出黨內共主級的前總統柯林頓（Bill Clinton）出面說項，以求凝聚黨內共識。
Using Google Translates, this means:
U.S. Democratic House Members are dissatisfied with President Barack Obama (Barack Obama) yield to pressure the Republican Party, intended to delay the vote on his proposed tax cut extension bill. Selected after the period of “lame duck ” Obama, a few days ago please the party of former President Bill Clinton common lord class (Bill Clinton) come forward to intercede in order to unite the party consensus.
If this is what our largest creditor thinks about us, I wonder how the rest of the world thinks?
At least we have a saving grace in the Tea Party. We’ve helped defeat the Omnibus Bill. That Pork laden monstrosity that the Democrats tried to ram through. Largely written by our Senator, Daniel Inouye (D-HI), and other criminal democrats, this bill would have put us further in debt to the tune of $1.3 Trillion dollars.
Think of it folks, just like Obamacare, a 2,000 page bill that was loaded with over 6,700 Earmark Spending!
However, not to just single out democrats, Republican’s also were equally at fault. However, they won’t be back.
It’s worth following the link and reading what was in the Bill. Amongst the items of just plain reckless spending was the so called, “Food Safety Bill“, buried within the Mega Spending. Also was more funding for Obamacare. Congress was trying to pull a fast one on the American people.
A new Congress begins next year, January 5th. With this new Congress comes great expectations on responsible spending. Defunding Obamacare, eliminating subsidies on Ethanol, bridges to no where, a Ted Kennedy center(?).
A Merry Christmas for the American people, and A Happy New Year
When is a tax cut, not a tax cut? When it’s a tax extension. The irresponsibility by the Democrats to cry fowl when Obama agreed to extend the current tax rates for all Americans, is equal, to Obama’s thoughtless comparison of Republicans as hostage takers. So much for unity, fairness, and governing.
Let’s remember that democrats believe anyone making over $200,000 a year, is considered rich.
The argument by the democrats is that we are giving tax breaks to the wealthy, but that is patently false. There are no tax breaks in this bill that’s winding through congress, although there are loads of spending that are not being funded. No Tax Breaks at all. It’s an continuation of the current tax rates.
After Obama campaigned to end the tax breaks and falsely declared tax breaks caused the economic collapse. Obama did an about-face and accepted continuance of the current rates. Shocking his minions in the alphabet press, and outraging his socialist democrat party.
My Mis-representative, Crazy Mazie Hirono, emails me to explain she will vote for continuing unemployment insurance, but disagreeing with the continuing the tax rates for all. However, like most democrats, Hirono cannot do the math, neither can she comprehend, the difference between tax breaks and tax extensions.
Questions for Ms. Hirono: Where will the jobs come from? How does continuing unemployment benefits encourage people to look for work? How is it fair by taxing anyone making over $200,000 a year, at a higher rate? Why is it fair to punish the people that create jobs? What is fair about punishing success?
I never got a job from a poor person. I never got a job from an unemployed person. Does Ms. Hirono expect jobs to come only from the government? How is that economically sustainable? The reality is the Federal government is spending too much. Why don’t you support a 25% reduction in federal spending, across the board?
Obama’s speaks about hostages. Obama is right, the hostages are the American people. However, it’s not the Republicans holding the American people hostage, it’s the democrats.