Constitutional Eligibility

Hawai’i’s inept Governor Neil Abercrombie may have handed birthers, and for that matter, conservatives and libertarians, a reason to question the eligibility of anyone campaigning to be President of the United States.

After the balding hippy, Abercrombie, opened his mouth with the promise to shut up those birthers that claim Obama is not a citizen of the United States, Abercrombie claimed he would prove the birth certificate existed.  But he couldn’t, because it doesn’t exist.

This has prompted several States to propose new eligibility laws to make the candidate for President of the United States prove they are citizen of the United States.  Arizona, Pennsylvania, Texas, Georgia, along with other States are seriously looking at eligibility requirements before they could be allowed on the State ballot.  If passed, this could jeopardize any plans for Obama’s 2012 presidential campaign.

Unless, of course, Obama could prove eligibility, which is proving doubtful at this time.

Within ten days after submittal of the names of the candidates, the national political party committee shall submit an affidavit of the presidential candidate in which the presidential candidate states the candidate’s citizenship and age and shall append to the affidavit documents that prove that the candidate is a natural born citizen, prove the candidate’s age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States as prescribed in article II, section 1, Constitution of the United States.

If this law, which follows the Constitutional requirement for eligibility, were to pass, it could very well eliminate Obama’s chances to even get on any states ballots.  Except for Illinois.
It is imperative that Obama is either eliminated from the 2012 ballot, or defeated at the 2012 ballot.  We cannot afford another stimulus like the one that Obama proposed during his State of the Union address on Tuesday, January 25 2011.  Obama wants HighSpeed Rail, but we already have AMTRAK which has been bleeding billions of dollars for years.  So that proposal makes about as much sense as throwing you money down the toilet.  The message of Investing in America is just another message to Spending.  After two Stimulus packages, that were suppose to fix infrastructure and create jobs, never flourished, Obama wants to spend more money, that we don’t have.
Obama believes, as he stated in his State of the Union speech, that government needs to be more involved in creating jobs.
Cutting the deficit by gutting our investments in innovation and education is like lightening an overloaded airplane by removing its engine. It may feel like you’re flying high at first, but it won’t take long before you’ll feel the impact.

However, the opposite is true.  When government gets out of our way, people thrive, business grows, wealth distributes, and jobs are created.  Obama doesn’t believe that.  In that statement, Obama is saying that Government is the Engine.  Let’s remember that engine was not invented by government.

What’s For Dinner?

Red Pepper and Crab Curry Bisque





Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: