Happy New Year 2012

I’ve decided not to reflect back on 2011, but to look forward to 2012.  There are so many obstacles to overcome in the new year that need to be addressed.  This sign at my local transfer station says it all!

Possibilities!  There are always possibilities!  After all, you don’t wish for a Happy New Year if you don’t really mean it, right?  So, instead of looking back, I’m looking forward!

Here’s to Winning The Future!  Ousting the Socialist Democrats from the Presidency and Congress! Winning the Senate and Keeping the House!  Now that’s a Plan!


What’s For Dinner?


Grilled Broadbill Fish and Pineapple with Jasmine Rice



2011 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2011 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

The concert hall at the Syndey Opera House holds 2,700 people. This blog was viewed about 29,000 times in 2011. If it were a concert at Sydney Opera House, it would take about 11 sold-out performances for that many people to see it.

Click here to see the complete report.

Bare Naked Dhimmitude


Extremist Groups Shut Down Free Speech:   Today, WordPress, the host of this blog, capitulated to the terrorist group known as CAIR.  Bare Naked Islam was a frequent read by many in the blogosphere community.  The accusation of threats against Muslims cannot be accurately verified since the site has been removed, but it probably was in the comment section.  I’ve frequented the site many times, and I have never seen an actual threat issued by the owners and authors of the blog.  BNI has reported ONLY the Truth about the Violent nature of Islam, which is either seldom reported in the news, or just plain ignored by the media.  This is very troubling for Free Speech advocates.  This is what Islam does, they bully companies, governments and non-muslims, and when they don’t get their way, they resort to violence.  There are plenty of examples of Islamic terror here and around the world.  Dhimmitude is the goal of Islam.  I Will Not Submit.


This is the Truth about Islam.  This is who they are.  They deny the centuries of atrocities their so called culture has committed against innocent people around the world.  This is how they work.  They enter your country, as either as refuges, or legal immigrants.  They don’t assimilate into the host culture.  Instead, they make demands on the host culture.  They force governments to conform to their version of Sharia Law; a barbaric form from of intolerance and prejudice against anyone non-muslim.

The message of Islam couldn’t be more clear.  Submit to Islam, or die!   It’s Simple!  Don’t think so?  Still have doubts?  Think this is just intolerance on my part?  OK, explain the Fort Hood shootings?  Explain the Christmas massacres in Egypt and Nigeria.  Explain the honor killings of daughters by muslims fathers.  How does a culture kill its own and not be held accountable for it? [see planned parenthood]

Is this the norm within the entire Islamic community?  I’ve lived in Malaysia and the Philippines, I’ve lived amongst them.  I have some firsthand knowledge of who they are.  I’ve seen firsthand the intolerance of Islam.  The violence of Islam.  The murderous hand of Islam.

CAIR claims that violence against muslims is on the rise.  If so, where is it reported?  Only in the Pro-Islamic website, and not in any official news outlets.  To find any violence against muslims, you have to look really hard, and then you have to fact check the articles.  Many are just made up stories, or greatly exaggerated stories to generate sympathy for muslims.  However, there are many stories of Islamic violence and they are all true.  BNI reported these stories, and fact checked them also.  Only after Islamic violence against innocents does a backlash against the so called “Religion of Peace” occurs.  Take the Ground Zero Mosque in New York for example, in Islamic theocratic culture, it is their custom to claim victory by insulting their victims and build a Mosque.  Read this article from last year:  What to make of Anti-Muslim Hate!

The controversial decision by Lowes to pull its advertisements from the very politically multicultural, and entirely farcical, TLC show “All-American Muslim“, was done to distance the company from the controversy the show was creating, and not by pressure by some Christian group that some in the media would have your believe.  This is part of the Islamic publicity problem.  They are perpetually offended by everything.  They want to be governed by Sharia Law and not by the Constitution.  They want to impose their theocracy demands and force others into their intolerance.  Sadly, this is what WordPress has done.  WordPress capitulated to radical Islam.

CAIR is responsible for this breach of freedom.  It is the first of many affronts on the United States Constitution by Islamic extremists.  Ibrahim Hooper is CAIR’s terrorist spokes person.  If there are moderate muslims out there, they should speak up against this terrorist.  And there are moderate muslims.  You’ve seen them on shows like Fox News.  They present assimilation into American life and live peacefully among all cultures.   Ibrahim Hooper, and CAIR, is a radical Islamic terrorist organization with criminal ties to Al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah and the violent Muslim Brotherhood.

It’s time to face the facts about Radical Islam.  The United States is in danger of following the way of Europe.  The violence by radical Islam in Europe is extreme and dangerous.  Yet, Eurasia is doomed.  They’ve let the Islamic problem go on for far too long.  It now has become generational within the population.  As we watch their cities burn, their people brutalized; their women raped and killed, we must realize this is also happening here in this Country.   There currently are two Islamist in Congress: Reps. Keith Ellison of Minnesota and Andre Carson of Indiana, both are Democrats.  Where are their loyalties?  To the Constitution or Islam?  Did they, along with CAIR, pressure WordPress to remove and archive Bare Naked Islam?  Will my post get me banned from WordPress?  We’ll see.

Related reading:


What’s For Dinner?


Cleanliness is Next to Godliness and Pork Fat Rules Baby!


The Tale of Sally the Salamander


Alternate title:  How do you know Newt is thinking?  Answer: He’s talking!  And what a pendulum swing it has been for Newt Gingrich.  The disgraced former Speaker of the House had spectacular successes and even more devastating failures.  Along the way in the Political Wilderness, Newt has amassed a collection of controversies that makes even the most hapless voter cringe at the thought of his definition of conservatism.  But perhaps I’m just being unfair.

From balancing the Budget, and the Contract with America; to NY-23 House race and sitting on the couch with Nazi Pelosi espousing the hoax of Global Warming.  Quite a distinguish career for an establishment politician.  And Gingrich is about as establishment as Bill Clinton is a skirt chaser.  I often wonder when Gingrich looks in the mirror if he doesn’t see Romney looking back.  Both have flip-flopped on just about every issue.  Was For abortion and then against it. Believes in manmade Global Warming, and then explains it as a conservative position.  A conservative position on what is a hoax?  Right!  He was favor of the healthcare mandate, then against the mandate.  It’s enough to make your head spin.

Newt Gingrich, in a 2008 appearance at Alegent Health Clinic in Bellevue, Nebraska, expresses strong support for an individual mandate.

However, unlike Romney though, Gingrich has some good ideas.  For example, Gingrich’s statements on having activist judges explain their controversial rulings.  I thought that was brilliant!

Gingrich has been emboldened by his reception on the campaign trial, where conservative voters have cheered his view that judges who have ruled in favor of gay marriage or against prayer in school are “activists” who should be thrown out. In particular, Gingrich has criticized the US. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, on the West Coast, as well as U.S. District Judge Fred Biery of Texas, who ruled this year that a public school district in Texas could not, among other things, use the words “prayer,” “amen,” “invocation” or “benediction” during a graduation ceremony.

Now, if you think about this statement, in its full context, it makes sense.  How does a judge explain threatening anyone with jail time for mentioning anything prayer related at either a graduation, or anywhere else?  What if someone used the phrase “Allah Akbar“?  Would that deserve the same scrutiny by this judge?  The ruling may be argued on the “Church verses State” logic, but even that is not unconstitutional.  But when pressed by CBS’c Face the Nation’s pretend to be journalist Bob Schieffer on how Gingrich would do that, Gingrich explained if necessary a President could send Marshall’s to arrest judges that refused to justify their rulings.  That’s an important note, by ignoring a congressional subpoena, by anyone, judge or not, could get you arrested.  Where Gingrich got in trouble is that everyone ignored the judge’s controversial ruling, and not the context of the question, if the judge refuses to comply with the subpoena.  That is perfectly constitutional and well within the bounds of the congressional and executive branches.  They are after all, co-equal branches of government and subject to the same checks and balances as outlined in the Constitution.

The downside is that it could be politicized by either party as a tit-for-tat revenge against the other party that hauled a judge before Congress.  We’re already close enough to being a Banana Republic as it is.  We no doubt have activist judges on the bench that have made controversial rulings.  California’s Prop 8 ruling is another good example of judicial activism gone awry.

Then there’s the claim by Gingrich of being a Theodore Roosevelt Republican.   Theodore Roosevelt brought us the Progressive movement.  Look how that has worked out.  Progressives have brought more nanny state regulations.  Socialist Liberals consider progressive policies in line with their view of a centralized controlled government.  Gingrich is a historian, but he’s choosing the same President that Obama fashions himself after.

During Roosevelt’s time in office, there was a need for child labor laws, clean water and air laws, fair wage and labor laws.  Since then, Progressives have moved into tighter unnecessary regulations that are stifling job growth.  The EPA and Dept. of Labor with its over-regulations is a perfect example.

Then Gingrich got into trouble by suggesting children, 14 years and older, could earn money and learn work good ethics by working to clean their schools.  Again, another brilliant idea!  And why not?  Like cleaning schools, or any other work related project, it’s the learning experience and life lessons that help create good work ethic values.  Properly supervised, it could be a rewarding experience for any child.  We’re not talking slave labor.  Make it voluntary and pay them a small wage, it’s a simple concept.  However, Progressives bureaucrats in the Obama Regime’s Department of Labor ruled that young people cannot work because of dangers.  Take the latest ruling by the Labor department:

Under new standards being advocated by the Labor Department, youths under the age of eighteen would be prohibited from working in hay lofts, giving shots, caring for baby animals, and being in the vicinity of animals whose behavior may be “unpredictable.”  For the estimated 1.3 million youths living or working on farms, this means no longer being able to perform routine chores if the farm is set up as a corporation or a business partnership.  Today, the vast majority of family farms are legally structured in this manner

Again, the context of Gingrich’s statement is good idea.  However, the message got lost because people on both sides started fanning their wings citing child labor laws.  The current labor laws allows for children of family farms to work the farm.  That’s been going on before the country was formed.  Labor conditions and laws currently already protect children from harm.  This is about Progressive Government Control.  In today’s world, with OWS kids that are not learning anything in school, have no work ethic, and no desire to find a job and cannot pay their college bills.  Young people have a misguided entitlement ethic. They think they should get the corner office and a $100,000 a year salary as soon as they receive their diploma.  Winning The Future?

Gingrich has enough baggage to cause concern.  However, I believe he’s the only candidate that can debate Obama and win.  Is he the right candidate for the country?  But then, how does the smartest guy in the room miss the signature deadline to get on the ballot in Virgina?



What’s For Dinner?


Pan Seared Onaga (Ula`Ula Koae) Over Broccoli Risotto





Mitt Romney – The Anti-Conservative

Make'e Kūlana 'A'ole

Romney cannot call Obama a Socialist, and when pressed on Obama’s patently obvious Socialist policies, Romney claims Obama is in over his head.  Romney couldn’t be more wrong.

Romney wastes no time attacking other conservatives though.  Even though Romney gained a Tea Party endorsement from South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, and some polling data shows Tea Party support in New Hampshire, Romney past indicates a pattern of obfuscation and flip-flopping.

An anti-Romney site that exposes Romney’s past can be found here.  But let’s remember that Romney believes in Man Made Global Warming.  Romney says he would repeal Obamacare, but he designed Romneycare which is what Obamacare is modeled after.  Romney has said he’d rather fix the parts of Obamacare that are broken.  This is his vision of “Winning The Future“?  WTF???

Winning The Future???

If Romney has a hard time recognizing overt socialism, then how can he claim to be a conservative?  Romney is following the same campaign strategy pattern as John McCain’s doomed 2008 Presidential run.  Romney will be portrayed as some “out-of-touch” rich 1% percent’er, a rich fat cat, a wealthy establishment type.  Obama will use that as his campaigned attack message, and Romney won’t call Obama a Socialist???  Let me quote Prince Harry Reid, “This Election Is Lost“!!!


What’s For Breakfast?


Eggs Benedict at Kilauea Lodge in Volcano Hawai’i




Merry Christmas


Wishing Everyone a Merry Christmas


Shaka Santa


One Horse Open Sanpan


There is no “X” in Christmas


Too Much Katnog


What’s for Christmas Eve Dinner?


Steak and Lobster with Fried Potato’s and Kim Chee Cucumber




Ron Paul: The Christmas Fruitcake

After the last GOP debate I asked myself, “Self, why is Ron Paul on stage with the GOP candidates?”

Ron Paul is a KOOK!  A Fruitcake that has more Nutcases following him around.  Ron Paul is a bigot also.  His newsletters proved that.  In a post debate interview with Sean Hannity, Paul was questioned about his newsletters.  A visibly annoyed Paul dismissed the question and said he wasn’t responsible for what someone wrote in his newsletter.  WTF???  “It’s your newsletter”, replied Hannity, “You don’t take responsibility for your own newsletter?”  Paul insisted that he has no control and never seen the content of his newsletters.  Really?  But there are other examples of Paul’s bigotry.

This nut is a political Fruitcake that has lived beyond his expiration date.  Equally so is his army of defenders that attack anyone that criticizes the crazy man that lives under the stairwell making tinfoil hats.

Pamela Geller over at Atlas Shrugs compiled a list of Ron Paul’s statement along with copies of Paul’s newsletters.  It is very revealing.  In the comment section of Ms. Geller’s website are a slew of hateful comments against Ms. Geller.  Mind you, she isn’t making a claim, she reporting Paul’s pattern of making unsubstantiated claims.  These are not new claims about Paul’s prejudicial behavior however.

These claims were also brought up during the 2008 election cycle also, but people were too enamored with Obama to properly explore the vetting process on Paul.  Then again, like today, Ron Paul is unelectable.

Think about this, here you have a candidate for President of the United States, and he has a staff of writers which “supposedly” speaks for Ron Paul, and he’s not aware of the content of his newsletter?  Does his staff not reflect the views of Ron Paul?  How can Ron defend the indefensible?

What about the Ron Paul Army?  The army of kooks that listen and follow Ron Paul, ever try to have a conversation with one of these Paulbots?


Ron Paul went on to appear on the Jay Leno show where he was asked about the other candidates, and what he said was very revealing:

A day after a GOP presidential debate, White House hopeful Ron Paul upbraided rival candidate Michele Bachmann for disliking Muslims.

“She hates Muslims,” Paul said on NBC’s “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno” on Friday. “She wants to go get ’em.”

He went on to accuse Rick Santorum of hating gays.  You can see the video here.  This is a pattern of obfuscation by Ron Paul.  People need to know if their candidate is honest and legitimate.  Ron Paul represents neither.  It doesn’t matter how many times he was elected in his district.  We’re talking about the leader of the Free World.  Ron Paul’s foreign policies are worse than Obama’s Apology Tour.


Tomorrow begins Hanukkah and I want wish my Jewish friends a Happy Holiday!

What’s For Dinner?


Tomato Soup and Grilled Ham and Cheese Sandwich

It’s a chilly rainy evening




%d bloggers like this: