Sustainable Lies

SustainLie

 

A disturbing trend by celeb scientists, entrepreneurs, and corrupt politicians to silence any discussion behind the hoax of global warming, by publicly admonishing so called “deniers”.  It seems Al Gore has managed to resurrect his efforts to force the American people and reputable scientists to accept as “fact” that the world is in danger of burning up.  Enlisting the help of questionable celebrity loudmouths like Bill Nye, the fake science guy, as some kind of “subject matter expert” to frighten people into believing in an unproven science theory.

cap-300x265

Richard Branson, CEO of Virgin Airlines and Space entrepreneur, has told global warming deniers to “get out of the way!”  In other words, don’t dare question man-made global warming, or else!  Following after Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook’s crazed outburst to investors get out of Apple stock if you don’t agree with his “green investment strategy.”  Branson has become the next voice in a chain of non-scientific CEO’s to publicly admonish investors that question the validity of the man-made global warming claim.  Yet, Branson’s airline is a huge polluter!

hotncold

It’s my way, or the highway!  In the minds of the intolerant left over the green energy agenda.  It’s not clear what the end goal of what a “sustainable” green environment will deliver since countries like China and India are not participants in the environmentalism movement.  What is certain is that green energy initiatives are costly and currently ineffective.  That doesn’t mean you don’t try to make the technology cost effective.  Likewise, you don’t want the government to use taxpayers’ monies to develop the technology, the government is a lousy investor of other people’s money.

BlackHole_Lensing

Equally disappointing is Astrophysics Neil deGrasse Tyson’s call to the media to stop giving equal time to global warming deniers.  I wonder about Tyson’s credibility as a scientist.  Has he fallen into the science consensus where the claim of science being settled is never to be questioned, ever?  Tyson’s television show debut, “Cosmos”, the remake of the late great Carl Sagan’s popular show on the science of the universe, was disappointing. Especially after the “Liar-in-Chief” Obama made the opening statement to the program.  In the show’s first episode, Tyson spent too much time on the life and persecution of Giordano Bruno, and almost nothing about other astronomers in history.  If this is what we can expect from Tyson’s remake of this classic show on science, then I predict it won’t get the ratings Tyson is hoping for.  Despite the great visual graphics, if the Cosmos presentation waivers off scientific principle and into political morality, then the show will quickly turn off people’s interest.


smJuliaGold

Why would a scientist like Tyson voice an opinion of intolerance against other climate scientists that disagree with the premise that global warming is man-made?  The science is not settled because there are no facts to connect a changing climate to man’s activities.  Climatologist like Dr. Roy Spencer and meteorologist Joe Bastardi, have empirical evidence to back up their claims that man-made climate change doesn’t exist, and that there are other factors that drives changes in the weather.

st019

NASA scientists James Hansen and Michael Mann used computer models as their evidence of global warming.  Both Mann and Hanson have a motivation to create a manufactured climate crisis in order to continue receiving government funding for their research.  There is evidence that both Hanson and Mann have falsified data about their claim of man-made climate change. Celebrity elites have romanticized global warming as their cause du jour.  If the climate is really changing because of man’s activities, then why haven’t supporters of that theory presented any evidence, other than computer models, to support their hypothesis?  Why are climate change supporters trying to shut off any debate by deniers?  Is their data so flimsy and questionable that they must prevent any debate?  Isn’t what Tyson is saying about the religious intolerance and persecution of Giordano Bruno, the same thing as denying deniers media access?  Science is not a consensus, and you don’t vote for science.

fractal

Enter the corrupt politicians.  Socialist democrats have used the environment to get funding and legislation passed to benefit themselves and their families.  They are robbing the American taxpayers’.  Obama spent over a trillion dollars to develop green energy initiatives and all of Obama’s policies have failed.  Thousands of people have lost their jobs.  Now, members of Congress want to waste more taxpayer monies to push another green energy program.

snotzs

Hawai’i’s unelected slip-and-fall lawyer, Brian Schatz, who was appointed by Hawai’i’s governor Neil “Crusty the Clown” Abercrombie after the death of Senator Daniel Inouye, is organizing a “talkathon” to try and convince the public that climate change is real.  After one of the coldest winters on record, these politicians still want to convince the public that the world is warming because of man’s activities.  After the EPA shutoff the water to California’s central valley and destroyed thousands of acres of crops, the government is claiming global warming is causing the drought.  If global warming is man-made, then YES!  Our government’s own stupidity has caused an environmental disaster.

nuke-tree

Clearly the environmentalist movement has been replaced by the communists party USA.  The movement is now an extremist organization whose goal is to hurt the United States economy.  They are emboldened by their leader, the liar in chief Obama, to over-regulate and over tax American’s, and American industries.  This is economic terrorism on a national scale.

Gaia

Why do they, the democrats, want to do this?  Answer: To deflect away from Obama’s disastrous socialist policies.  Especially, Obamacare. Several socialist democrats are up for reelection, and by creating a strawman environment argument over the false narrative of global warming, it draws attention away from Obama’s policies that are hurting the American economy.  It is a classic bait-and-switch deflection just like Obama’s claim; “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor!  If you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance!”  If you like your environment, the government will come in and take your environment.  Either way, America loses.

 

rwbline

 

 What’s For Dinner?

 

ScShSpDia

 

Shrimp and Scallops Fra Diavolo

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: