It’s becoming increasing apparent that the Global Warming crowd and the Population Control crowd have a common goal. That is to control other peoples lives. These Eco-Nazi’s have created an atmosphere of fear that the earths resources are being used up by too many people and their activities are causing the planet to warm excessively is simply false. There is a preponderance of observations to dispute both claims of anthropogenic conditions. However, since fear is a powerful emotion, it is easier to frighten people into believing something that either has not been proven or is outright fiction.
The Cooling Burning Earth
The relationship between the two groups, Global Warming and Over Population, have during a period of time used the same arguments to press their case for regulating human activity. Like some Hollywood disaster movie, they back their reasoning through the use of science. Increasingly, using theoretical data, yet unproven data, to declare a consensus among scientists. But who are these scientists? How did they gather their data? What methods did these scientists use to verify their data? How does this relate to over-population?
Why do they, the Global Warming Scientists, refuse to answer questions about the data?
Journalist Phelim McAleer (‘Mine Your Own Business’, ‘Not Evil Just Wrong’) asks Prof Stephen Schneider from Stanford University an Inconvenient Question about ‘Climategate’ emails. McAleer is interrupted twice by Prof Schneider’s assistant and UN staff and then told to stop filming by an armed UN security guard. Resorting to strong-arm tactics, anyone that questions the validity of the data Global Warming Scientists have presented will be subject to arrest, ridicule and condemnation. Questions have been met with accusations of being a flat-earth believer. Questions have been dismissed as extremism. Yet, the Global Warming hysteria persists.
Climategate, that recent event in the news that casts a shadow of doubt on those scientists that advocate Global Warming as real and settled data. Papers that were denied peer review because they did not fit the narrative of the consensus. Emails that clearly showed there was a conspiracy among some scientists to falsify facts to make Global Warming a serious problem.
The documents show that these scientists have been fabricating, cherry-picking, fudging, hiding, destroying, and otherwise abusing data; intimidating dissenting scientists and journal editors who might publish their work; filtering out dissenting research from the information reviewed by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and by climate change agencies of national and state or provincial governments around the world; and violating Freedom of Information laws and scientific journal policies about data sharing and transparency-hallmarks of proper scientific method.
This makes other institutions of Climate observations suspect also: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and NASA’s Goddard Institute, are they also corrupt? James Hanson, NASA’s warming scientist and close ally to Vice-President Al Gore, has promoted man-made global warming and used his data to spread fear of global catastrophe’s. Hanson has gone on record urging trials against those who dissent against man-made global warming. Effectively muzzling any challenge to his claim of looming environmental disaster as caused by man. It reminds me of how Galileo was brought before The Inquisition for his belief in Heliocentrism:
But in 1632 Galileo published his Dialogue on the Great World Systems, which once again advanced heliocentrism. He was called before the Inquisition. The proceedings were not of the highest quality. Galileo’s enemies produced a forged document stating that Galileo had been absolutely forbidden to teach heliocentrism, instead of being forbidden to teach it as fact; and Galileo lied about the circumstances of the publication of his book.
I see parallels to Galileo experience when compared to Phelim McAleer experience in asking a question about questionable data on global warming. If you don’t like the question, eliminate the questioner. Chief architect in the Global Warming religion is Al Gore. We know Al Gore has positioned his Global Warming alarm-ism into a business model that will reap billions of dollars for him and at the expense of others:
Mr. Gore and his cohorts have consistently smeared climate realists and policy skeptics as “deniers,” paranoiacs or corporate shills. “Denier” invokes Holocaust denial. Paranoia is linked to those conspiracy theorists who claim that Neil Armstrong’s lunar landscape was really a movie backlot. The corporate shill angle is usually based on “exposing” some skeptical individual’s or organization’s link to Big Oil, which is in fact irrelevant unless you judge science on the basis of funding rather than objectivity. Oil companies in fact devote far more money to supporting climate hysteria.
One of Al Gore’s arguments was the hockey stick jump in global warming temperatures. Since then that has been proven to be bad mathematics
and poor science. Yet, Al Gore lied and promoted the lie to such a state that anyone challenging the lie was vehemently dismissed as a denier.
Everyone Should Watch This Video
(H/T) Watts Up With That and The Autopsy
So how does this relate to over-population and global warming.
It’s all about the environment.
Alarmist are already saying that the reason for global warming is caused by man. Anthropogenic interference is hurting the planet. With no data to support that theory, the over-population alarmist creates a climate of pending disaster and world-wide cataclysmic events. A violent upheaval that causes great destruction or brings about a fundamental change to the planet. Even now, there are those in high government positions that can influence legislation to control the lives of people. The plot thickens when David Rockefeller gives a speech about over population. In this video, you will hear and see him discussing how the U.N. should sustain the population.
Chilling. Isn’t it.
The thought of some government agency controlling the world’s population is absurd, but it is being considered. All under the theory that too many people will consume too many resources and will facilitate a disaster. Sounds like a Hollywood move in the making. But this is real and scary when you consider that world leaders are seriously considering this as a solution to a problem that doesn’t exists.
A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.
Anyone in their right mind would never consider an act that would limit the number of children a family could have, but in China, they already have a one child policy. The culture in China is to produce a first born male child. Females are not given the same reverence as males children and are usually either discarded or given up for adoption. So what you’re left with is a over-population of males in a society with very little females to go around. That is the kind of manipulation that will form anarchy in any society.
Let’s not forget that Obama has in key cabinet positions zealots of population control. John Holdren
and Cass Sunstein
are just two of Obama’s whacked-out CZAR’s that promote population control and extreme environmental regulation.
I have an Idea
It’s all about control in the end isn’t it.
I recently read an op-ed article by Sarah Palin on Climategate:
This scandal obviously calls into question the proposals being pushed in Copenhagen. I’ve always believed that policy should be based on sound science, not politics. As governor of Alaska, I took a stand against politicized science when I sued the federal government over its decision to list the polar bear as an endangered species despite the fact that the polar bear population had more than doubled. I got clobbered for my actions by radical environmentalists nationwide, but I stood by my view that adding a healthy species to the endangered list under the guise of “climate change impacts” was an abuse of the Endangered Species Act. This would have irreversibly hurt both Alaska’s economy and the nation’s, while also reducing opportunities for responsible development.
Palin is right on by stating that the climate does change. Also, Palin questioned how much human activity is responsible for climate change as debatable. I’m still waiting on the facts to be presented on how humans manipulate world-wide climate changes. Anthropogenic climate change is still not proven and any data presented is severely flawed, if not absolutely fabricated. Again, I ask, present the data for debate. That has yet to be done.
There is one scientific fact, and that is Anthropogenic Grifting. Lot’s of people are in line to make lots of money through government taxation and vaporous carbon regulations. It’s all smoke and mirrors.
Science is always a Debate.
There is never a Consensus.
Otherwise it is not Science.
To distort a quote from Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano , Global Climate Change is a Man-Made Disaster. Which is masking the issue like re-gifting Christmas as Winter Solstice. It’s bad religion anyway you look at it. Only government regulation and interference will hurt the environment by reducing the standard of living we enjoy today. The environment is also a way of life. Prosperity and economic growth can work with issues of protecting the environment. Not regulating the lives of people through birth control, what car you can drive, how you heat your house and what food you can eat. This is the politics of fear which the environmentalist and over-population alarmist are using to enact laws to control your lives.
Obama keeps yammering on about responsibility, yet his administration is filled with the most irresponsible people in government. None of his CZAR’s or cabinet positions are qualified for the job. For that matter, neither is Obama.
Doctor Zero at HotAir.com posted an article that well worth the read:
You aren’t going to frighten the world into reducing the human population. You’re not going to succeed in terrorizing free people into embracing totalitarianism, to fend off a phantasmal catastrophe that no democratic nation has the discipline to combat. We’re not going to politely ignore swarms of private jets and limos ferrying you to carbon-belching “climate summits,” where you draw up plans for the Western proletariat to live as primitive hunter-gatherers. We’re not going to let a pampered elitist, who once flew around the world to attend cricket practice, tell us that we need to make do without air travel and ice water.
Unstoppable Solar Cycles: The Real Story of Greenland
The question you should be asking to Global Warming Alarmists: How do you know know warming is bad?
Red Planet Cartoons nails it again with a perfect commentary to Global Hoaxing.
(H/T) Yogi Love
Hele He’e Nalu
Lets Go Surfing. It’s a beautiful day here in Hawai’i. The surfers are out in Alae just north of Hilo. The water seems to be just where its always been. Except for the tides, the water has not risen beyond its normal water marks.
What’s for Dinner?
Pan Seared Red Snapper over Edamame Broccoli Risotto